December 31, 2007IndialiberalismlibertarianModipoliticsPublic PolicysecularismUPA

A lesson in opposites

Why doesn’t Karan Thapar dare to call anti-Hindutva by its name?

This is an archived blog post from The Acorn.

In an op-ed that wishes for Narendra Modi’s sudden removal’, (via Offstumped) Karan Thapar writes:

Where does this leave the regional parties and the Left? They may retain their identity, even their present base, but they will have to line-up behind Modi or Sonia, in the saffron camp or the liberal/secular one. They may even have to submerge themselves within the broad appeal of the camp they belong to. [HT]

Now calling for parties to line-up against Modi is fine. But why the subterfuge? For neither Sonia Gandhi, nor the Left nor any of the regional parties are truly secular. And they are far from being liberal”.

Secularism and Liberalism are lofty principles. The word that Thapar should use is anti-Hindutva. Will Thapar, Sonia Gandhi or anyone else in that camp dare declare that they are anti-Hindutva?



If you would like to share or comment on this, please post it on Twitter Previous
Guest post: Benazir’s sacrifice changed little
Next
Pragati January 2008: 17 ways in which India can be a better country

© Copyright 2003-2021. Nitin Pai. All Rights Reserved.