March 19, 2008ChinademocracydemonstrationsForeign AffairsfreedomIndialibertymediaprotestsRealismrealpolitikrefugeesTibet

India can do better on Tibet

India muddled on the protests, but it must rethink its Tibet policy

This is an archived blog post from The Acorn.

When China’s prime minister said he appreciated” the Indian government’s response to public protests by Tibetan refugees, many interpreted that he was sending over a note of thanks. But Wen Jiabao’s statement could actually have been a warning.

The Tibetan issue is a very sensitive one in our relations with India,” Mr Wen was quoted as saying by AFP news agency. We appreciate the position and the steps taken by the Indian government in handling Tibetan independence activities masterminded by the Dalai clique.” [BBC]

It is the first sentence sets the context.

As The Acorn argued while criticising the decision to stop protesters from attempting to cross over into Tibet, there is room for India to take a position that is less deferential to China. Sumit Ganguly similarly condemns the Indian government for cracking down on peaceful protesters and notes that being seen as unwilling to offend China will make India’s claims to great power status in Asia, let alone beyond, appear utterly hollow”.

In Brahma Chellaney’s opinion, it is past time India reclaimed leverage by subtly changing its stance on Tibet.” He proposes three changes: first, that India must bring Tibet back into focus in bilateral negotiations, placing the onus on Beijing to make Tibet a political bridge between the two countries; second, that India should treat the Dalai Lama as an ally and plan for the time when he is no longer on the scene; and third, India should stop gratuitously referring to Tibet as a part of China”.

If you would like to share or comment on this, please discuss it on my GitHub Previous
Chennai rejects
Just how serious is the Naxalite threat?

© Copyright 2003-2024. Nitin Pai. All Rights Reserved.