September 9, 2008bookscounter-insurgencycounter-terrorismIndiaJammu & Kashmirjihadismediaproxy warSecurityterrorism

Why terrorists are called militants” in India

Owing to the Panthic Codes

This is an archived blog post from The Acorn.

It is not uncommon for the Indian media to call the terrorists in Jammu & Kashmir, or Assam or elsewhere militants”. In India, Pakistan and the Secret Jihad: The covert war in Kashmir, 1947-2004, Praveen Swami tells us why:

Indian journalists who reported on the struggle for the creation of a separate Sikh state, Khalistan, had traditionally used the terms extremists” or terrorists” to describe the character of the groups engaged in this enterprise. Khalistan groups subsequently imposed a set of codes on civil society in general, and on the media in particular, which among other things deemed the use of these terms impermissible. Known as the Panthic Codes, these rules of reportage were imposed upon the media at gunpoint. The term militant”, now widely used in the Indian press to describe armed opponents of the State, was the product of this coercion. As a journalist who worked through that period, and because the term militant” conflates non-violent political radicalism with specific forms of armed activity, I find its use unacceptable. [India, Pakistan and the Secret Jihad]

If you would like to share or comment on this, please discuss it on my GitHub Previous
The stuff for military novels
Weekday Squib: When those hadrons finally collide

© Copyright 2003-2024. Nitin Pai. All Rights Reserved.