January 9, 2009AfghanistanForeign AffairsIndiaIranIsraelmilitarynuclear weaponsRealismrealpolitikSaudi ArabiaTalibanUnited States

An all-American dogma the size of Iran

The solution is staring at Barack Obama’s face—if he has the audacity to grasp it

This is an archived blog post from The Acorn.

It is good to hear General Petraeus acknowledge that Iran had common interests with the United States and other nations in a secure Afghanistan.” Although he hinted that such interests might make talks with Iran feasible, he said he would leave the topic to diplomats and policy makers.

I don’t want to get completely going down that road because it’s a very hot topic,” General Petraeus told a conference…Nonetheless, he said, there are some common objectives and no one I think would disagree.”

Like the United States, Iran is concerned about the narcotics trade in Afghanistan and the resurgence of extremists there, he said. It doesn’t want to see Sunni extremists or certainly ultrafundamentalist extremists running Afghanistan any more than other folks do,” he said, while acknowledging that the United States and Iran have some pretty substantial points of conflict out there as well.” [NYT] And the most substantial point of conflict is Iran’s nuclear weapons programme. Yet, it may well be that the best way to convince Iran to temper its quest for nuclear weapons might well be for the United States to engage it politically. After all, hostility with the United States and Israel is one key reason why Iran seeks those weapons (the Saudi Arabia-Pakistan nuclear nexus is another).

In fact, it is amazing how the US foreign policy establishment is thinking up options and throwing up names for special envoys without questioning whether the holy cow, or rather the holy taboo, of not engaging Iran is a position that has run its course (if it was ever tenable in the first place). If intellectual blinkers and dogma prevent US policymakers from considering the merits of engaging Iran, what prevents countries like India that would benefit from a US-Iran rapprochement from lubricating it? There is a need for strong, credible voices to support the likes of General Petraeus in helping the United States break the ice with Iran.

Aside: The word ultrafundamentalist” now enters the lexicon thanks to General Petraeus. As for ultrafundamentalist extremists”, now, there’s way too much redundancy built into that phrase.

If you would like to share or comment on this, please discuss it on my GitHub Previous
The upheavals to come
Comical Gilani

© Copyright 2003-2024. Nitin Pai. All Rights Reserved.