September 26, 2009AsideGurkhashistoryhumourlevitymilitaryNepalPakistanPartitionUnited States

Sunday Levity: But Foster, Gurkhas aren’t Pakistanis

Why Uncle Sam needs Pakistan (“Because of the Gurkhas” edition)

This is an archived blog post from The Acorn.

Ignorance about India”, Narendra Singh Sarila writes, was the reason why the Americans came to rely on British advice on questions concerning the subcontinent after its independence.” He quotes an anecdote to illustrate this:

In those days, the Americans’ understanding of India was extremely limited. To take an extreme example, John Foster Dulles, President Dwight Eisenhower’s secretary of state, had to be disabused by Walter Lippmann during a conversation on SEATO as late as in 1955, that Gurkha troops were not Pakistanis.

Look Walter’, Dulles said, I’ve got to get some real fighting men in the south of Asia. The only Asians who can really fight are the Pakistanis. That’s why we need them in the Alliance. We could never get along without the Gurkhas.’ But Foster’, Lippmann replied, the Gurkhas aren’t Pakistanis, they’re Indians’. (Actually, Gurkhas are of Nepalese origin.) Well’, responded Dulles, they may not be Pakistanis but they’re Moslems.’ No I’m afraid they’re not Moslems either; they’re Hindus’, Lippmann pointed out. [Dennis Kux, Disenchanted Allies pp72, quoted by Narendra Singh Sarila, The Shadow of the Great Game pp216]

If you would like to share or comment on this, please discuss it on my GitHub Previous
Ilyas Kashmiri, Stanley McChrystal and the Obama wobble
When Bill Clinton had to be scared

© Copyright 2003-2024. Nitin Pai. All Rights Reserved.