October 26, 2010 ☼ Buddhism ☼ East Asia ☼ Foreign Affairs ☼ Hinduism ☼ history ☼ international relations ☼ Islam ☼ liberal nationalism ☼ Pax Indica ☼ Public Policy ☼ Realism ☼ realpolitik ☼ secularism ☼ Vietnam
This is an archived blog post from The Acorn.
“We have allowed,” today’s Pax Indica contends “our misunderstanding of secularism to keep religion out of the foreign policy toolkit.”
No one bats an eyelid when someone argues that we should use democracy, free-market capitalism, socialism or “South-South solidarity” to promote India’s interests abroad. But mention religion and all sorts of people jump at you. The first objection you hear is that “it’s against our secular values”. This is absurd, as I’ve just argued, because secularism applies only to India’s internal affairs.
It is unacceptable for a country with one of the world’s largest Muslim populations, one with the longest experience of practising the Islamic faith in a multi-religious society to have no voice at all in one of the most important geopolitical dynamics of our time. India’s lack of Islamic soft power is a symptom of its, well, secular rejection of religious soft power. If we are serious about being a major global power, if soft power is to be something more than a feel-good story, and indeed for our own survival and security, we must dispassionately begin to make strategic use of our religion and culture. [Read the rest at Yahoo! India]
© Copyright 2003-2023. Nitin Pai. All Rights Reserved.