January 22, 2016constitutional moralityconstitutionalismliberal nationalismnationalismProvocations

Don’t worry about anti-nationals

India is not threatened by people with anti-national ideas

This is an archived blog post from The Acorn.

This blog is a votary of Indian nationalism—which it contends is essentially of a liberal, plural and non-supremacist nature. As a supporter of republicanism, it upholds the value of dharmo rakshati rakshitah (the law protects those who protect it). It is a strong advocate of constitutional methods.

That is why it is important to note that it is no crime to be anti-national”.

An anti-national is a person who is opposed to nationalism—the idea that a group of people sharing some common bonds constitute a unique community—and therefore is also opposed to the idea of national interest”. There are good intellectual foundations for denying the legitimacy and basis of nationhood, and good arguments critiquing the idea of national interest. However, this blog holds that the arguments against nationalism and national interest are inferior in the context of the real world.

That does not mean someone holding anti-national opinions is criminal, unpatriotic, seditious, treasonous. It is important not to conflate these terms.

According to Oxford Dictionaries:

anti-national: Opposed to national interests or nationalism

unpatriotic: Not having or expressing devotion to and vigorous support for one’s country

treasonous: The crime of betraying one’s country, especially by attempting to kill or overthrow the sovereign or government

seditious: Inciting or causing people to rebel against the authority of a state or monarch

[Oxford Dictionaries]

In the Indian republic today, sedition is a crime—although it ought not be be one in our constitutional order. Acts of treason are punishable under sections of the penal code and acts pertaining to national security. Being anti-national and unpatriotic, on the other hand, are not crimes per se.

Indeed, the Constitution protects the right to have anti-national and unpatriotic beliefs and opinions, and propagate them peacefully. These rights are subject to laws that impose reasonable restrictions…in the interests of the sovereignty and integrity of India, the security of the State, friendly relations with foreign States, public order, decency or morality or in relation to contempt of court, defamation or incitement to an offence.”

India’s liberal democratic order should permit and tolerate anti-national and unpatriotic ideas. The ideas that hold the Indian republic together are much stronger than them. Political and social orders held together by coercion, dogma and force need to fear sedition and free thought. A constitutional order built on reason and liberty need not worry about people’s beliefs.



If you would like to share or comment on this, please discuss it on my GitHub Previous
Our bane
Next
On Hollande’s mind

© Copyright 2003-2024. Nitin Pai. All Rights Reserved.